About SMH America

SMH America is brought to you by Stoner Games and is a Subsidiary of The LAM Organization for Disaster Relief. Purchases through this platform Generate Revenue for a Nonprofit Organization that Donates to causes such as UNICEF and Saint Jude's Children's Hospital.

Friday, August 23, 2024

Couple Shot A 74-Year-Old Female Security Guard and Another Man at a Waffle House


 Couple Shot A 74-Year-Old Female Security Guard and Another Man at a Waffle House


Lynchburg Police are seeking public assistance as they investigate a shooting at a Waffle House, where a 74-year-old female security guard and another man were injured. Authorities are searching for a 2007 black Nissan Altima, which they believe may be connected to the incident.



22 Dead and Over 60 Injured in Maine Mass Shooting by Army Reservist with Mental Health Issues


22 Dead and Over 60 Injured in Maine Mass Shooting by Army Reservist with Mental Health Issues

A devastating mass shooting in Maine has left 22 people dead and over 60 injured, marking the deadliest such incident in the state's history. The gunman, identified as Army Reservist Robert Card, had a known history of mental health issues.

In a video obtained by WMTW-TV 8, taken from a New York State Police body camera, Card is seen being interviewed by officers at Camp Smith in Cortlandt, New York, on July 16, 2023. This footage provides a glimpse into Card’s interactions with law enforcement months before the tragic event.

Army officials are scheduled to testify on March 7, 2024, before a special commission that is investigating the mass shooting. The testimony will address the circumstances surrounding the incident and the mental health challenges faced by Card, offering crucial insights into the factors that led to this horrific event.

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Jason Carter Honors Grandfather's Legacy in Speech at DNC


 Jason Carter Honors Grandfather's Legacy in Speech at DNC

On the second night of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Jason Carter, grandson of former President Jimmy Carter, took the stage as one of the evening's early speakers.

In his address, Jason Carter highlighted the enduring legacy of his grandfather, emphasizing the former president’s lifelong commitment to service. He drew a connection between that legacy and Vice President Kamala Harris, stating that she embodies the same dedication to public service. Carter also shared that his grandfather, who is nearing 100 years old, is eager to cast his vote for Harris in the upcoming election.


The convention, which runs through Thursday in Chicago, will culminate with Harris formally accepting the Democratic nomination for the 2024 presidential election.

Who is Jason Carter? Jason Carter is a former Georgia state senator and the grandson of President Jimmy Carter. In 2014, he was the Democratic nominee for governor of Georgia but was defeated by then-Governor Nathan Deal. Today, he serves as a lawyer and the chair of the Carter Center, a human rights organization founded by his grandparents in 1982.


His Role: Jason Carter continues to uphold the values and mission of his grandfather, who spent his life advocating for peace and defending democracy both in the United States and internationally. As an emissary of that legacy, Jason plays a crucial role in continuing the Carter family’s commitment to these ideals.

Key Quote: "My grandfather can’t wait to vote for Kamala Harris. She reminds us all that the promise of America remains unchanged. We are one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, and my grandfather knows that with her as our next president, we will keep that promise."

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

Sen. John Fetterman Chooses Family Time Over DNC Convention


 Sen. John Fetterman Chooses Family Time Over DNC Convention

Senator John Fetterman has decided to skip the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this week, opting instead to spend quality time with his three children. In an interview with The Free Press, Fetterman explained, "I’ve got three young kids, and they’re out of school. That’s four days I can spend with my children."

Fetterman, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, revealed that his decision to forego the convention was made well before the pivotal debate on June 27 that significantly impacted the Democratic primary. That debate led to a series of unexpected events, culminating in President Joe Biden stepping out of the race, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, who then secured enough delegate votes to become the Democratic nominee even before the convention.

The decision to stay home has not been without controversy. Fetterman has faced criticism from within his party, particularly from progressive factions, due to his unwavering support for Israel during the ongoing conflict in Gaza. His stance, which has included displaying photos of Israeli hostages taken by Hamas in his office and opposing calls for a cease-fire, has put him at odds with some of his more progressive colleagues. Even his communications director, Carrie Adams, has expressed disagreement with his views on the Middle East conflict.

Fetterman’s position on Israel contrasts sharply with the progressive image he cultivated during his time as mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania, and during his 2022 Senate campaign, where he championed issues such as raising the minimum wage and protecting LGBTQ+ rights. His casual appearance, often featuring hoodies and shorts, also contributed to his reputation as a progressive outsider. However, since his Senate race, Fetterman has distanced himself from the progressive label, referring to himself simply as "just a Democrat."


Despite the tension between Fetterman and parts of the Democratic Party, he has continued to support the party’s broader goals. Though he expressed disappointment at Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race, Fetterman endorsed Kamala Harris, posting a fundraising link for her on social media and declaring his full support for her presidential bid. He also participated in a Harris-Walz rally in Philadelphia on August 6, further solidifying his commitment to the party’s future.

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Rep. Crockett at DNC: 'Kamala Harris Brings Experience; Donald Trump Brings Legal Troubles'


 Rep. Crockett at DNC: 'Kamala Harris Brings Experience; Donald Trump Brings Legal Troubles'


At a recent event hosted by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Representative Jasmine Crockett didn't mince words when comparing Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.

"Kamala Harris has a wealth of experience and a proven track record of public service," Crockett stated. "In contrast, Donald Trump is facing a growing list of legal challenges and criminal accusations."

Rep. Crockett praised Vice President Harris for her accomplishments and dedication to the American people, highlighting her career as a senator and attorney general. "Kamala Harris has a résumé that reflects her commitment to justice and progress," she added.

In sharp contrast, Crockett pointed out the legal issues Trump is currently facing. "While Kamala is working to build a better future for all Americans, Trump is busy dealing with a rap sheet that keeps getting longer."

Crockett's remarks underscored the stark differences between the two political figures, emphasizing the importance of experience and integrity in leadership.

Monday, August 19, 2024

Manhunt Underway After Convicted Murderer Escapes in North Carolina


 Manhunt Underway After Convicted Murderer Escapes in North Carolina

Hundreds of law enforcement officers are actively searching for Ramone Alston, a 30-year-old convicted murderer, who escaped from custody after being transported to a hospital in North Carolina, according to the state’s Department of Adult Correction.

Alston, who was serving a life sentence, managed to break free from a prison transport vehicle on Tuesday morning. The incident occurred at around 7 a.m. at the U.N.C. Hospitals Hillsborough Campus, where Alston was brought for a medical appointment. According to authorities, Alston freed himself from his leg restraints while still handcuffed and made a dash into nearby woods as soon as the vehicle door was opened.

By midday Wednesday, the search had expanded to cover 1,335 acres, involving 335 law enforcement officers from 19 different agencies, as reported by Keith Acree, the department’s communications director.

Though officers were armed when Alston escaped, they did not fire, as the escape happened too quickly, Acree explained.

Kirby Saunders, the emergency services director for Orange County, assured the public that Alston is no longer believed to be in the immediate area, reducing the imminent threat to the community. However, authorities suspect that Alston may have received assistance in his escape, though they have not provided specific details. A $35,000 reward for information has generated numerous tips, with two considered particularly promising, according to Orange County Sheriff Charles S. Blackwood.


Despite no direct evidence suggesting Alston is armed, officials warn that he should be considered dangerous and believe he has likely removed his handcuffs by now.

Alston was convicted in 2018 for his role in a 2015 shooting that tragically killed a 1-year-old girl on Christmas Day. Although his lawyers argued that Alston did not fire the fatal shot, he was sentenced to life in prison and was being held at Bertie Correctional Institution, over 100 miles from the Hillsborough medical campus.

James D. Williams Jr., a Durham-based lawyer who represented Alston during the 2015 investigation, stated that he had not been in contact with Alston and learned about the escape from news reports.

Questions have been raised about why Alston was taken to a medical facility so far from his prison. Acree explained that the Hillsborough campus was chosen because the appointment was a follow-up with a specific provider at that location, and the transfer was necessary due to medical requirements.

Details about the ongoing search remain limited, as law enforcement is cautious about revealing too much information publicly. Officials acknowledge that Alston may have already left the state.

“The ground search phase is winding down,” Acree stated during a Wednesday press conference, indicating that the focus will now shift to investigating leads and tips. When captured, Alston is expected to be placed in a maximum-security facility, likely Central Prison in Raleigh.

Sunday, August 18, 2024

Google Reports Iranian Hack Attempts on Trump and Biden-Harris Campaigns


Google Reports Iranian Hack Attempts on Trump and Biden-Harris Campaigns


Google revealed in a report on Wednesday that it identified efforts by Iranian hackers to target both the Trump and Biden-Harris campaigns in May and June, as part of a broader ongoing phishing operation.

This announcement by Google supports the Trump campaign’s recent claim that it was targeted by an Iranian hacking campaign aiming to interfere with the U.S. election.


According to Google’s Threat Analysis Group, which monitors government-backed cyberattacks, it disrupted a “small but persistent” phishing operation carried out by a hacking unit linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

During May and June, “targets included the personal email accounts of approximately a dozen individuals associated with President Biden and former President Trump, including current and former U.S. government officials and individuals connected to both campaigns,” the report stated. Google blocked numerous attempts to access the targets’ personal email accounts.

The report also noted that in July, Iranian hackers managed to breach the Gmail account of a prominent political consultant. Google secured the account and referred the case to law enforcement but did not disclose the consultant’s identity or whether they were involved with either campaign.

The hacking group tied to the Revolutionary Guard is known for its relentless persistence. Google reported that it continues to observe unsuccessful attempts to compromise accounts linked to Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Trump.

These attempted hacks are part of a larger campaign targeting U.S. and Israeli entities, using Google products like Sites, Drive, and Gmail.

Last week, concerns about credible hacking threats to U.S. presidential campaigns escalated when Microsoft reported that Revolutionary Guard-affiliated hackers had breached the email account of a former senior adviser to a presidential campaign. However, Microsoft did not provide further details on who was targeted.

A spokesperson for Iran’s Mission to the United Nations did not respond to requests for comment. Previously, Iranian state news reported that a representative for the mission denied any involvement in hacking Trump’s campaign.

Over the weekend, three U.S. news outlets — Politico, The Washington Post, and The New York Times — reported receiving emails that appeared to contain Trump campaign files, suggesting a possible “hack-and-leak” operation intended to embarrass Trump. On Monday, the FBI announced it was investigating efforts to hack both the Trump and Biden-Harris campaigns but did not provide additional information.

So far, only the Trump campaign has claimed to have been hacked. The phishing attempts occurred before Biden exited the race and Harris became the Democratic nominee. A Harris campaign official told NBC News they were unaware of any security breach.

To date, no major cybersecurity firm or government agency has confirmed that Iran successfully hacked the Trump campaign. Microsoft has declined to elaborate on its report, with a spokesperson stating that the company’s policy is not to disclose details about hacking victims unless requested by the victim.

These developments follow a warning from a U.S. intelligence official from the Foreign Malign Influence Center, indicating that Iran was likely to continue efforts to undermine Trump.

Saturday, August 17, 2024

Will Kamala Harris’ Polling Lead Hold? A Polling Expert Weighs In


 Will Kamala Harris’ Polling Lead Hold? A Polling Expert Weighs In

Kamala Harris is enjoying the momentum of a new candidacy, which has quickly pushed her into the lead.

Just three weeks into her campaign, the vice president has seen a surge in support, closing a gap that Joe Biden struggled to overcome during his run. However, the question remains: how stable is this lead?

It’s been an extraordinary month in American politics, where any single major event would typically create a temporary shift in the polls. Events like the July 13 assassination attempt on Donald Trump, the Republican convention, Trump’s selection of a running mate, Biden’s exit from the presidential race, and Harris’ choice of vice-presidential candidate have all played a role. But untangling the impact of each event to determine the true state of the race is challenging, and with the Democratic convention on the horizon, more changes could be imminent.

How has the race evolved at a deeper level? And if Trump regains the lead, what indicators will signal that shift before it’s reflected in the top-line polling?

A flood of surveys in the coming days will start to shed light on these questions, followed by two intense months of polling. Several key metrics have supported Harris’ early success: her rising favorability ratings and Trump’s shrinking lead on the economy, a core issue for the former president.

“Presidential campaigns are marathons, but this one has turned into a sprint,” said Neil Newhouse, Mitt Romney’s lead pollster during his 2012 presidential bid. “That tends to benefit the candidate who’s new on the scene.”

Here are five critical metrics to watch, beyond the top-line polling, to gauge the true state of the race:

Kamala Harris’ Favorability Rating

June 27: 39% (RealClearPolitics average)
Now: 45%

Voters are beginning to see Harris in a different light since she became the Democratic presidential candidate.

Over the past three years, Harris has faced a significant gap between those who view her favorably and those with an unfavorable opinion. That gap is now closing. A recent New York Times/Siena College poll showed that, in key battleground states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, 50% of likely voters viewed her favorably, compared to 48% unfavorably.

However, this favorable perception might not last. Trump’s campaign has launched a wave of advertisements in battleground states, portraying Harris as “dangerously liberal,” which could negatively affect her favorability, especially as her record comes under closer scrutiny in the weeks following her campaign launch.

“Image is a precursor to ballot change,” Newhouse noted. “You’ll see her image shift before the polling numbers do, with her unfavorability ratings, particularly the strong ones, potentially rising.”

Trump, too, is enjoying a high-water mark in favorability — the best since the 2020 election — following the assassination attempt and Republican convention. This suggests that his numbers could also decline to more typical, less favorable levels.

“With Kamala Harris, it’s like ‘A Star is Born,’” said Mark Mellman, lead pollster for then-Senator John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race. “It’s real, it’s natural, but it’s not necessarily permanent. It’s possible that both candidates’ favorability ratings could dip a bit over time.”

Since Harris replaced Biden as the Democratic nominee, the percentage of voters indicating support for one of the three independent or third-party candidates — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Cornel West, or Jill Stein — has nearly halved.

While this is technically part of the broader polling picture, it also highlights a unique aspect of this election: more voters, fueled by Harris’ rise in popularity and Trump’s post-assassination and post-conviction boost in favorability, are inclined to support the main candidates. This is a shift from earlier in the race when up to a quarter of voters expressed dissatisfaction with both Biden and Trump.

Friday, August 16, 2024

Fox News’ Laura Ingraham and Maria Bartiromo Mislead Viewers on U.S. Oil Production Despite Historic Highs


Fox News’ Laura Ingraham and Maria Bartiromo Mislead Viewers on U.S. Oil Production Despite Historic Highs

On the August 13 episode of The Ingraham Angle, Fox News host Laura Ingraham, along with Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo, presented misleading narratives regarding U.S. oil production and the fossil fuel industry's impact on the economy. They claimed that the Biden administration had "banned more drilling and exploration on federal lands," suggesting that this was negatively affecting job creation and the economy.

However, these claims are contradicted by the latest data. According to Politico, the United States is producing more oil than any country in history, with an abundance of natural gas driving down prices. Moreover, oil production on federal lands has seen a significant increase during the Biden administration, with an uptick of approximately 530,000 barrels per day since 2020, as reported by E&E News.


Politico also highlighted that U.S. oil production recently set a new record, averaging 13.4 million barrels per day. This represents a 5% increase compared to pre-pandemic levels in 2019.

Interestingly, despite this surge in production, employment in the oil and gas extraction sector has dropped by nearly 20% since 2019. This decline isn't due to a lack of drilling or government restrictions, but rather the industry's increasing reliance on efficiency and automation. As Greg Upton, executive director of Louisiana State University's Center for Energy Studies, explained, "You just need fewer workers to produce more oil."


These facts not only challenge but dismantle the narrative pushed by Fox News. The reality is that record-breaking oil production and declining job numbers coexist due to technological advancements, not government policy. Ingraham’s and Bartiromo’s assertions fail to account for the rapidly changing dynamics of the energy workforce.

Furthermore, their narrow focus on expanding fossil fuel production ignores the urgent necessity of transitioning to renewable energy sources, a shift that is crucial for addressing the escalating climate crisis and could pave the way for new, sustainable job opportunities.

Harris Proposes Major Tax Relief for Families Welcoming a New Baby


 Harris Proposes Major Tax Relief for Families Welcoming a New Baby

Vice President Kamala Harris is set to introduce an ambitious economic plan aimed at easing the financial burden on American families by addressing key expenses such as housing, groceries, and child-rearing costs. 

A central feature of the plan is a significant expansion of the child tax credit. Under Harris's proposal, low- and middle-income families could receive up to $6,000 for each new baby, alongside the restoration of the pandemic-era benefit that provided up to $3,600 per child. This move aligns with Republican proposals, including one from Vice Presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, who has suggested a $5,000 child tax credit.


While President Joe Biden has faced challenges in gaining recognition for his economic policies, particularly in reducing prices, polls indicate that Harris fares better in voter confidence on economic issues. During a campaign stop in Las Vegas on August 10, Harris acknowledged the ongoing issue of high grocery prices, stating, "While our economy is doing well by many measures, prices for everyday things like groceries are still too high. You know it and I know it."

Harris's plan also targets housing affordability. In Raleigh, North Carolina, she will deliver her campaign's first major policy address, where she plans to propose tax incentives that could lead to the construction of 3 million new housing units within four years. This exceeds the Biden administration's current proposal of 2 million new and renovated homes. Harris's proposal includes unspecified tax breaks for homebuilders focusing on first-time buyers and affordable rentals, along with a $40 billion fund to support local governments in financing housing developments, doubling the Biden administration's $20 billion proposal.


Additionally, Harris will advocate for a $25,000 down payment assistance program for first-time homeowners, which could benefit over 4 million buyers. This plan is more generous than Biden's State of the Union proposal, which offered a $10,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers.

On the corporate front, Harris will emphasize her commitment to challenging corporations that profit excessively from consumers. Drawing from her experience as California's attorney general, she will pledge to fight corporate price gouging, particularly by landlords and pharmaceutical companies. Harris plans to propose an extension of the $35 insulin price cap to all Americans, not just seniors, and a $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs.


Harris's campaign also indicates she will support legislation restricting tax breaks for corporate investors purchasing homes and banning the use of algorithmic data by rental property owners to increase rent prices. Regarding grocery prices, Harris will advocate for a federal ban on price gouging in the food sector, with a particular focus on meat prices. She will argue that the concentrated meat processing industry is a significant factor driving up grocery costs and commit to more aggressive investigations and prosecutions of price-fixing in the meat supply chain.

The plan also proposes empowering the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general with the authority to investigate and penalize corporations that keep grocery prices high instead of passing savings to consumers. Additionally, Harris's administration would scrutinize mergers in the food sector to ensure they do not lead to higher grocery prices.

Columbia University President Steps Down Amid Controversy Over Israel-Gaza Protests


 Columbia University President Steps Down Amid Controversy Over Israel-Gaza Protests


Minouche Shafik, Columbia University’s President, has resigned, marking the end of a brief and contentious tenure characterized by significant unrest and criticism over her management of pro-Palestinian protests on campus earlier this year.

Shafik’s decision to bring New York police onto campus twice during the protests—once to dismantle a Gaza solidarity encampment and again to clear students occupying a building—sparked widespread backlash. In May, a group of faculty expressed a vote of no confidence in her leadership, accusing her of infringing on students' rights and academic freedom.

In an email to the Columbia community on Wednesday night, Shafik announced her immediate resignation, citing the challenges of navigating a deeply divided campus environment. She noted that recent events had taken a heavy toll on her family, as well as the broader community.

Reflecting on her decision, Shafik wrote, “I have concluded that stepping aside at this juncture is the best way for Columbia to move forward in addressing the challenges ahead.”

The Board of Trustees, in a separate communication, stated that they had “reluctantly” accepted Shafik’s resignation and named Katrina Armstrong, the CEO of Columbia’s Irving Medical Center, as the interim president. The trustees expressed confidence in Armstrong’s ability to lead the university through this transitional period.

Shafik, an economist originally from Egypt, was the first woman to serve as Columbia’s president since its founding. Her tenure, however, quickly became fraught with difficulties. Just a few months into her presidency, the October 7 Hamas attack ignited the Israel-Gaza conflict, leading to widespread protests on Columbia’s campus, mirroring similar demonstrations across the country.

Columbia’s handling of these protests drew intense scrutiny. Congress launched an investigation into the university’s alleged failure to protect Jewish students, compelling Shafik to testify before a House committee on issues related to antisemitism. The U.S. Department of Education also initiated an inquiry into claims of both Islamophobia and antisemitism on campus.

The situation further escalated when three Columbia deans resigned earlier this month after Shafik reprimanded them for sending text messages containing what was described as “ancient antisemitic tropes” during an event focused on Jewish life.

Shafik’s departure marks the third resignation of an Ivy League president since the House Education and Workforce Committee began its hearings on university leaders’ responses to campus pro-Palestinian protests. These hearings saw intense questioning of university policies, rule enforcement, and public statements.

At Columbia, Shafik faced a difficult balancing act: Some students and faculty urged her to protect protesters’ rights to free expression, citing Columbia’s long-standing tradition of student activism, from Vietnam War protests to more recent movements like divestment from private prisons. After Shafik’s initial call for police intervention, 70 students and faculty members signed an open letter accusing her of “violating our community’s values.”

On the other side, Republican lawmakers pressured Shafik to crack down on what they described as hateful and hostile protests against Jewish students. Representative Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) criticized Shafik in a May letter, accusing her of allowing the campus to be overrun by “mob rule” and appeasing “antisemitic radicals.” Following Shafik’s resignation, Stefanik issued a statement celebrating the news, calling her presidency “untenable.”

Jelani Cobb, Dean of Columbia’s Journalism School, acknowledged the extraordinary challenges Shafik faced, describing this past year as one of the most tumultuous in the university’s recent history. Cobb noted that Armstrong, the interim president, is highly regarded within the Columbia community for her straightforward leadership style.

Jeanine D’Armiento, a professor at Columbia’s medical school and chair of the University Senate’s executive committee, expressed confidence in the university’s future, saying, “We were preparing all summer collaboratively, and she [Shafik] is just one individual. We’re looking forward to the semester and getting back to the academic work.”

As news of Shafik’s resignation spread, reactions among students were mixed. Cameron Jones, a junior and lead organizer with Jewish Voice for Peace, viewed the resignation as a victory for student activism and vowed to continue advocating for the Palestinian cause.

Conversely, Elisha Baker, a co-chair of the pro-Israel group Aryeh, hopes Columbia’s new leadership will enforce stricter regulations on campus protests, potentially including rules on where and when demonstrations can occur and policies to prevent protesters from masking their identities.

As Columbia prepares for the upcoming academic year, the university community remains in a state of reflection and anticipation, with many hoping for a smoother path forward under new leadership.

Thursday, August 15, 2024

2.9 Billion Records, Including Social Security Numbers, Compromised in Massive Data Hack: Key Details


 2.9 Billion Records, Including Social Security Numbers, Compromised in Massive Data Hack: Key Details

A staggering number of Social Security numbers and other sensitive information belonging to millions of people may now be in the hands of a hacking group following a significant data breach. The Los Angeles Times reported this week that the compromised data might have been sold on an online marketplace.

The hacking group, known as USDoD, allegedly stole personal records of 2.9 billion individuals from National Public Data, according to a class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, as reported by Bloomberg Law. The breach is believed to have occurred around April 2024, according to the lawsuit.

Here’s what you need to know about the alleged data breach:

What Information Was Compromised?

The law firm Schubert, Jonckheer & Kolbe, which filed the class-action suit, stated in a press release that the stolen data file is 277.1 gigabytes in size and contains names, address histories, family connections, and Social Security numbers dating back at least three decades.

According to a cybersecurity expert’s post on X (formerly known as Twitter), the group USDoD claims to be selling the 2.9 billion records of U.S., U.K., and Canadian citizens on the dark web for $3.5 million.

Since the data was put up for sale in April, other versions of the data have surfaced, according to the cybersecurity and technology website Bleeping Computer.

In August, a hacker known as "Fenice" reportedly released the most comprehensive version of the data for free on an online forum, Bleeping Computer reported.

What is National Public Data?

National Public Data is a background check company based in Florida and operated by Jerico Pictures, Inc.

While National Public Data has not publicly confirmed the breach, The Los Angeles Times reported that the company has been responding to inquiries via email, stating, "We are aware of certain third-party claims about consumer data and are investigating these issues."

Multiple Individuals Charged in Connection with Actor Matthew Perry’s Overdose Death


 Multiple Individuals Charged in Connection with Actor Matthew Perry’s Overdose Death

Several individuals have been charged in connection with the accidental overdose death of actor Matthew Perry, according to law enforcement sources who spoke with NBC News on Thursday.

Perry, 54, was discovered unresponsive in the heated section of his pool at his Pacific Palisades residence on October 28, 2023. The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner’s Office determined that his death was due to the acute effects of ketamine, a powerful anesthetic with hallucinogenic properties.

Sources reported that at least one arrest was made in Southern California early Thursday. Federal prosecutors are expected to unseal an indictment later today, detailing the charges against this individual and others involved.


The family of Keith Morrison, a “Dateline” correspondent and Perry’s stepfather, expressed their relief at the recent developments.

“We were and continue to be devastated by Matthew’s passing, but it brings some solace knowing that law enforcement has treated his case with the seriousness it deserves,” the family stated. “We look forward to seeing justice served.”


In May, the Los Angeles police confirmed their collaboration with federal authorities to investigate the source of the ketamine found in Perry’s system.


Ketamine, long popular as a recreational drug, has recently gained attention for its potential in treating depression. An increasing number of clinics offer ketamine infusions or injections for various mental health conditions.

Perry had been receiving ketamine infusion therapy for depression and anxiety, though his last session occurred over a week before his death. The medical examiner noted that the ketamine detected in Perry’s body “could not be from that infusion therapy” due to its short half-life.


The ketamine levels in his system were significantly high, comparable to those used for general anesthesia in surgical procedures, according to the medical examiner’s findings.


Ultimately, Perry’s death was ruled accidental, with contributing factors including drowning, coronary artery disease, and the presence of buprenorphine, a medication used to treat opioid dependence.

Perry, beloved for his role as Chandler Bing on the hit TV show “Friends,” had been candid about his struggles with opioid addiction and alcoholism, which he detailed in his 2022 memoir, “Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing.” The medical examiner’s report noted that Perry had been sober for 19 months at the time of his death.

It’s not unusual for law enforcement to investigate and, in some cases, charge those responsible for supplying drugs that lead to high-profile fatalities.

For example, after Michael Jackson’s death in 2009, his personal physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for administering a fatal dose of potent drugs. More recently, federal prosecutors in New York charged four individuals who provided actor Michael K. Williams with the fentanyl-laced heroin that resulted in his 2021 death.

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Hamas Declines Participation in Gaza Ceasefire Talks, Senior Official Confirms


 Hamas Declines Participation in Gaza Ceasefire Talks, Senior Official Confirms


A senior Hamas official has informed the BBC that the group will not be taking part in the upcoming indirect talks on a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release, which are scheduled to resume in Doha on Thursday.

The official stated that Hamas is seeking a concrete roadmap for the implementation of any agreements and is unwilling to engage in talks merely to "provide cover for Israel to continue its war." He emphasized that the roadmap should be based on the proposal put forward by U.S. President Joe Biden at the end of May, and accused Israel of introducing "new conditions" to the negotiations.

In response, Israel’s Prime Minister has denied making any new demands, instead asserting that it is Hamas who has been pushing for changes.

Despite Hamas's refusal to participate, the talks are still expected to proceed, with U.S., Egyptian, and Qatari mediators aiming to develop a plan to resolve the outstanding issues. The negotiations have faced multiple setbacks, particularly after the assassination of Hamas's political leader and chief negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran. The U.S. hopes that finalizing a deal might deter Iran from retaliating against Israel—whose involvement in the assassination has neither been confirmed nor denied—and help prevent a broader regional conflict.

Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza following an unprecedented attack on southern Israel by Hamas on October 7, which resulted in approximately 1,200 deaths and 251 hostages being taken. Since then, over 39,960 people have been killed in Gaza, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry.

Last week, the leaders of the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar issued a joint statement urging Israel and Hamas to urgently resume talks to secure a deal that would bring relief to the people of Gaza and address the situation of the remaining 111 hostages, 39 of whom are presumed dead. The leaders indicated that a framework agreement is "now on the table with only the details of implementation left to conclude," and they expressed their readiness to present a bridging proposal if necessary.

Israel responded by agreeing to send negotiators to Thursday’s talks, while Hamas requested that mediators present a plan based on discussions from a month and a half ago, rather than initiating new rounds of negotiations. On Wednesday, a senior Hamas official confirmed that their representatives would not attend the meeting, despite many being based in Doha.

“We want a roadmap to implement what we have already agreed upon, based on President Biden’s ceasefire plan and the Security Council resolution, which guarantees Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, particularly from the Philadelphi corridor [along the border with Egypt], and allows for the return of displaced persons to northern Gaza without restrictions, as well as the flow of humanitarian aid,” the official told the BBC. He also claimed that Israel had added new conditions and had not honored previous agreements.

The initial phase of the deal proposed by President Biden on May 31, and supported by the UN Security Council, included a "full and complete ceasefire" lasting six weeks, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from populated areas of Gaza, and the exchange of some hostages, including women, the elderly, and those who are sick or wounded, in return for Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. The subsequent phases involved the release of all remaining hostages and a "permanent end to hostilities," followed by a significant reconstruction plan for Gaza and the return of deceased hostages' remains.

On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that unpublished documents revealed Israel had introduced five new conditions in a letter dated July 27, adding to the principles set out in the May proposal presented by President Biden. The July letter reportedly included a map showing that Israel would maintain control over the Philadelphi corridor, contrary to the earlier proposal, which suggested withdrawing Israeli forces from densely populated areas along Gaza’s borders.

The report also mentioned that the July letter stipulated a mechanism to ensure that only unarmed civilians returning to northern Gaza would be allowed through the Israeli-controlled Netzarim corridor, effectively dividing the territory.

In response to the report, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office issued a statement denying the addition of new conditions, calling them "essential clarifications" instead. The statement accused Hamas of demanding 29 changes to the May 27 proposal, which Netanyahu had refused to accept, although no details about Hamas's demands were provided.

Later on Tuesday, President Biden acknowledged that the negotiations were becoming increasingly difficult but vowed not to give up. He also expressed hope that an agreement would prevent Iran, Hamas’s primary backer, from retaliating against Israel for Haniyeh’s assassination.

When asked whether Iran might halt its actions if a ceasefire deal were reached, President Biden responded, "That's my expectation, but we'll see." Israel, which has not confirmed its involvement in Haniyeh's killing, has warned Iran that it would "exact a heavy price for any aggression." Iran, meanwhile, has dismissed Western calls for restraint, insisting that a punitive response against an aggressor is a "legal right."

Haniyeh has been succeeded by Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, who was a key figure behind the October 7 attack. On Monday, Netanyahu stated that Sinwar "has been and remains the only obstacle to a hostage deal."

Expected Increase in Social Security Payments for 2025: What You Need to Know


 Expected Increase in Social Security Payments for 2025: What You Need to Know


The Social Security Administration (SSA) has just released the first of three key figures that will determine the 2025 cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), and it suggests that next year’s increase in monthly benefits may be more modest than in previous years.

In July, the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) saw a 2.9% rise compared to the same month last year. This index is a critical factor in calculating the COLA, which is based on the changes in this inflation measure from July through September each year. The final COLA for 2025 will be announced in October.

For 2024, the COLA increased monthly Social Security benefits by 3.2%, following a period of heightened inflation. Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, notes that if inflation continues to cool, the 2025 COLA could range between 2.6% and 2.9%. “People are still frustrated by high prices,” she observes, “but it appears we’re slowly moving past the worst of the inflation.”

Sri Reddy, Senior Vice President for Retirement and Income Solutions at Principal Financial Group, echoes this cautious optimism. “Both general and core inflation have seemed to stabilize at around 3% in the first half of this year,” Reddy states. “Unless significant economic events disrupt this trend, the 2025 Social Security COLA is likely to fall between 2.75% and 3.25%.”

A COLA aligned with the July CPI-W figure of 2.9% would mean an increase of about $54 per month for the average Social Security retirement benefit, which was approximately $1,870 in June 2024. Similarly, the average monthly survivor benefit ($1,508 in June) would rise by $44, and the average Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) payment ($1,538 in June) would increase by $45.

The 2024 COLA had provided an extra $59 per month for the average retiree, reflecting a sharp decrease from the previous year’s 8.7% COLA — the largest increase since 1981 — which was driven by a significant spike in consumer prices.

David Certner, AARP’s Legislative Counsel and Policy Director, emphasizes the importance of the COLA for retirees: “Social Security is often the only income that adjusts for inflation, making it crucial for seniors. Whether the increase is large or small, AARP has long fought to preserve the COLA, ensuring seniors can keep up with rising costs throughout their retirement.”

The CPI-W tracks the price changes in a specific basket of goods and services, including essentials like food, energy, and medical care. This index, reported monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is a subset of the broader Consumer Price Index (CPI), which serves as the main indicator of inflation. In July, the broader CPI also rose by 2.9% year over year, down slightly from 3% in June.

To determine the COLA, the SSA compares the average CPI-W for the third quarter of the current year to the same period from the previous year.

In 2023, the CPI-W rose 2.6% in July, 3.4% in August, and 3.6% in September. This led to an average increase of 3.2% for the quarter compared to the same period in 2022, resulting in the COLA that took effect in January 2024.

While a 3% COLA in 2025 would be the smallest since 2021, it is consistent with pre-pandemic trends, when inflation was relatively stable. Between 2001 and 2020, the average COLA was around 2.2%. In years without inflation, such as 2009, 2010, and 2015, there was no COLA. The highest adjustment on record was 14.3% in 1980.

Social Security benefits may lag behind inflation during periods of rapid price changes, depending on the direction of the CPI, but “over the long term, it does offer protection,” says Munnell, who has extensively researched the issue.

For instance, beneficiaries experienced a loss of purchasing power in 2021 when the 1.3% COLA — based on low inflation in 2020 — was overtaken by surging consumer prices. This pattern continued in 2022, with a 5.9% benefit increase being outpaced by 9% inflation. However, beneficiaries have mostly caught up as inflation has decreased over the past two years.

“The COLA directly reflects national inflation data, ensuring it offsets price increases since the last adjustment,” explains Emerson Sprick, Associate Director of Economic Policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center. “Because of relatively stable prices this year, beneficiaries should expect only a moderate adjustment in 2025 — a welcome change from recent years.”

It’s also important to note that Medicare costs can impact the COLA’s effectiveness as a hedge against inflation. For instance, if Medicare Part B premiums increase in 2025, it could reduce the net COLA benefit for recipients who have these premiums deducted from their Social Security payments, which is the case for most Medicare enrollees.

In their 2024 annual report, Medicare trustees estimated that the standard Part B premium could rise from $174.70 per month to $185 in 2025, potentially reducing the COLA increase by $10.30 per month for those affected. However, this estimate is preliminary, and the final premium will be announced in the fall.

Social Security trustees have also highlighted a looming financial challenge for the program, projecting that without congressional intervention, benefits could be reduced by 17% by 2035. Sprick cautions that while COLAs are important, the program’s long-term financial stability is the bigger concern. “We sometimes place too much emphasis on COLAs,” he says. “The real threat to older Americans’ financial security is the potential funding shortfall in Social Security.”